Will ESLwatch consider evidence offered to substantiate that a review is false or was posted in breach of a contractual obligation?

We are not well suited to determine the accuracy, completeness, or authenticity of evidence supplied by an interested party objecting to a particular post. And evidence supplied by an interested party is nearly always open to some degree of dispute. We do not want to find ourselves censoring the viewpoints expressed on our site when we cannot be certain it is warranted.

Leave a reply